Naval Aviation has been a costly and challenging
field since the beginning. To this day, as the level
of technology and defense budget increases each year, not every country has the
capacity and resources to operate even a single aircraft carrier capable of
operating fixed-wing aircraft. But aircraft carriers seemed to be on their way
back to the globe. China's ambitious carrier program creates significant
pressure for the nations in the region. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
Wealthy neighbors in northeastern Beijing such as South Korea and Japan are working hard to convert their helicopter destroyers into small aircraft carriers. The United Kingdom also soon has its own new Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers. There is a common factor behind these developments, and that is the F-35B stealth aircraft. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
 |
| F-35B on Destroyer |
Wealthy neighbors in northeastern Beijing such as South Korea and Japan are working hard to convert their helicopter destroyers into small aircraft carriers. The United Kingdom also soon has its own new Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers. There is a common factor behind these developments, and that is the F-35B stealth aircraft. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
The advent of the F-35B Lightning II stealth fighter jet is a
huge leap forward in almost every indicator compared to the Harrier. Possessing
short take-off and vertical landing ability, even smaller amphibious assault ships
can become an aircraft carrier.
It become particularly attractive to medium-sized navies. Compared to carriers and amphibious assault ships, destroyers are much more common and also easier to own for countries with limited defense budgets. Nearly every destroyer in the world today has a helicopter deck. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
The idea here is, with its special take-off capability, could be F-35B land on this landing deck and continue operating? - A destroyer that can carry an F-35 will bring significant deterrent power to any Navy force possesses it. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
It become particularly attractive to medium-sized navies. Compared to carriers and amphibious assault ships, destroyers are much more common and also easier to own for countries with limited defense budgets. Nearly every destroyer in the world today has a helicopter deck. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
The idea here is, with its special take-off capability, could be F-35B land on this landing deck and continue operating? - A destroyer that can carry an F-35 will bring significant deterrent power to any Navy force possesses it. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
An F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will act as the eyes
and ears of the destroyer, providing data on targets the ship couldn't even see.
The combination of sensors and data networks, the new system will allow Navy
ships and aircraft to cooperate to defeat enemy missiles and aircraft at
greater distances than ever before. The idea is like that. Can F-35 operate on Destroyer?
However, for the F-35 to actually be deployed as an asset for that destroyer, meaning to be stationed on it. The short answer is no. Landing F-35B fighter on a destroyer could potentially render both the F-35B and the ship incapacitated, or worse, seriously damaged.
In order to have a clear explanation for the idea of landing F-35 beyond the helipad of the destroyer, it is important to understand that the landing deck is just one of many factors serving an F35B fighter. Theoretically, F-35B cannot land on destroyers, because of the Destroyers decks are designed to serve helicopters with a load capacity of only about 9.5 tons.
Meanwhile,the maximum weight of an F-35B can be three times greater than that. Vertical take-off is very fuel intensive and means it has to sacrifice the payload for fuel. On the other hand, the fuel that the F-35B and the helicopters use is also different. So even after successfully landing on the destroyer deck, the F-35B had no fuel to continue operating.
However, for the F-35 to actually be deployed as an asset for that destroyer, meaning to be stationed on it. The short answer is no. Landing F-35B fighter on a destroyer could potentially render both the F-35B and the ship incapacitated, or worse, seriously damaged.
In order to have a clear explanation for the idea of landing F-35 beyond the helipad of the destroyer, it is important to understand that the landing deck is just one of many factors serving an F35B fighter. Theoretically, F-35B cannot land on destroyers, because of the Destroyers decks are designed to serve helicopters with a load capacity of only about 9.5 tons.
Meanwhile,the maximum weight of an F-35B can be three times greater than that. Vertical take-off is very fuel intensive and means it has to sacrifice the payload for fuel. On the other hand, the fuel that the F-35B and the helicopters use is also different. So even after successfully landing on the destroyer deck, the F-35B had no fuel to continue operating.
One of the most important systems for F-35B fighters after the fuel is ALIS and an AutonomicLogistics Information System that helps diagnose and load data for the F-35B before each flight. Certainly, destroyers
do not have this system.
The heat generated from the exhaust nozzles of the F-35B engine is too great. The original helicopter landing deck was not designed to withstand this. The heat of a downward jet blast would be destroyed the pad. It should be emphasized that the ability of the F-35B to fly depends on the jet engine, while the helicopter depends on the wind turbines generated. These two types of lifts have a very different heat output. How long can an F 35 stay in the air?
Next is the hangar, the F-35B is much larger than a conventional helicopter, and even if it lands on the destroyer, the F-35B will not fit into the hangar. Even giant destroyers like the Zumwalt-class destroyers with hangars for two helicopters cannot accommodate F-35Bs. The length of the F-35B is 15.7m (51.4 ft), a wingspan of up to 11m (35ft), and it should be remembered that F-35B is not capable of folding wings like F-35C. Leaving a hundred million dollar machine exposed to the harsh marine climate will undoubtedly cause the F-35B to be seriously damaged, especially in its stealthy shell.
The heat generated from the exhaust nozzles of the F-35B engine is too great. The original helicopter landing deck was not designed to withstand this. The heat of a downward jet blast would be destroyed the pad. It should be emphasized that the ability of the F-35B to fly depends on the jet engine, while the helicopter depends on the wind turbines generated. These two types of lifts have a very different heat output. How long can an F 35 stay in the air?
Next is the hangar, the F-35B is much larger than a conventional helicopter, and even if it lands on the destroyer, the F-35B will not fit into the hangar. Even giant destroyers like the Zumwalt-class destroyers with hangars for two helicopters cannot accommodate F-35Bs. The length of the F-35B is 15.7m (51.4 ft), a wingspan of up to 11m (35ft), and it should be remembered that F-35B is not capable of folding wings like F-35C. Leaving a hundred million dollar machine exposed to the harsh marine climate will undoubtedly cause the F-35B to be seriously damaged, especially in its stealthy shell.
Next is the ammunition supply, System no destroyer
is designed to carry weapon of the air force, such as air-to-air missiles,
cruise missiles or smart bombs. This makes the F-35B after landing on the destroyer will not
be able to re-equip weapons.
Finally, the logistic system, Because it was not
designed to serve the F-35B, the
destroyer did not have spare parts available, and even the maintenance for this
expensive fighter was difficult. Thus, in an emergency, if F-35B land on
the destroyer deck, it is likely that both the aircraft and the warship will be
seriously damaged after landing. Even with a safe landing on the destroyer deck,
the F-35B will not be able to take-off
again due to the lack of the ALIS system. There was no fuel to use, no maintenance in
place, no supplies of weapons-making the fighter useless.
So even in an emergency where it is impossible to return to the aircraft carrier landing on the sea will still the best option for the F-35B instead of occupying the deck of the helicopter on the destroyer. It is better to lose a fighter than to endanger destroyers and crew members.
So even in an emergency where it is impossible to return to the aircraft carrier landing on the sea will still the best option for the F-35B instead of occupying the deck of the helicopter on the destroyer. It is better to lose a fighter than to endanger destroyers and crew members.
0 Comments